![]() C) Apparently those right-wing radio talk shows are starting to bear fruit. _ P1) Domestic terrorism (e.g., the bombing in Oklahoma City) is on the increase nowadays. Apparently those right-wing radio talk shows are starting to bear fruit. _ Fallacy of relevance arguer ignores the substance of the opponent's argument and then allude to certain circumstances that predispose the opponent to argue this way for the purpose of discrediting the opponent's argument The issue is the degree to which slavery influenced the Civil War the arguer ignores the substance of Noland's argument and the then attempts to discredit Noland's argument by alluding to certain circumstances that affect Noland.ĭomestic terrorism (e.g., the bombing in Oklahoma City) is on the increase nowadays. Arguer ignored the substance of Noland's argument (to what extent did slavery influence the Civil War), and then alluded to the circumstance (Jeffery Noland is a history from Alabama) that predisposed Noland from arguing this way for the purpose of discrediting Noland's argument. C) Jeffry Noland's arguments should be discounted. P3) Noland could not possibly present an accurate account of the American Civil War. ![]() P2) Jeffery Noland is a historian from Alabama. _ P1) In his History of the American Civil War, Jeffry Noland argues that the war had little to do with slavery. Therefore, his arguments should be discounted. However, as a historian from Alabama, Noland could not possibly present an accurate account. In his History of the American Civil War, Jeffry Noland argues that the war had little to do with slavery.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |